Contraceptive Method Use Among a Population-Based Cohort During the South Carolina Choose Well Initiative.

Importance: Evaluating the impact of statewide contraceptive access initiatives is necessary for informing health policy and practice. Objective: To examine changes in contraceptive method use among a cohort of women of reproductive age in South Carolina during the Choose Well contraceptive access initiative. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cohort study, baseline data from the initial Statewide Survey of Women administered from October 1, 2017, to April 30, 2018, to a probability-based sample of women of reproductive age in South Carolina and a peer state (Alabama) were linked with 3 follow-up surveys given in 2019, 2020, and 2021. Responses about contraception use from the initial survey were compared with responses across follow-up surveys using the regression-based differences-in-differences method. Data analysis was performed from October 2023 to February 2024. Exposure: The South Carolina Choose Well contraceptive access initiative seeks to fill contraceptive access gaps and increase provision of a full range of contraceptive methods through engagement with a wide range of health care organizations across the state. Main Outcomes and Measures: Changes in contraceptive method use, including long-acting reversible contraception (LARC), intrauterine devices (IUDs), implants, short-acting hormonal injection, and barrier or other methods between the baseline survey (2017-2018) and 3 subsequent surveys (2019-2021). Results: A total of 1344 female participants (mean [SD] age, 34 [7] years) completed the first survey (667 in Alabama and 677 in South Carolina). Use of LARC significantly increased in South Carolina (119 [17.6%] to 138 [21.1%]) compared with Alabama (120 [18.0%] to 116 [18.1%]; P = .004). Use of IUDs increased in South Carolina (95 [14.0%] to 114 [17.4%]) compared with Alabama (92 [13.8%] to 102 [15.9%]; P = .003). These associations persisted in the adjusted analysis, with a significant increase in the odds of LARC (adjusted odds ratio, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.06-1.44) and IUD (adjusted odds ratio, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.06-1.32) use at follow-up in South Carolina compared with Alabama. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of 1344 participants, increases in the use of IUDs in South Carolina were noted after the implementation of the South Carolina Choose Well initiative that were not observed in a peer state with no intervention. Our findings may provide support in favor of statewide contraceptive access initiatives and their role in promoting access to reproductive health services.

Postpartum long-acting reversible contraceptive adoption after a statewide initiative.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the effects of a comprehensive, multiyear (2015-2020) statewide contraceptive access intervention in Delaware on the contraceptive initiation of postpartum Medicaid patients. The program aimed to increase access to all contraceptives, including long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARC). The program included interventions specifically targeting postpartum patients (Medicaid payment reform and hospital-based immediate postpartum (IPP) LARC training) and interventions in outpatient settings (provider training and operational supports). DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTING: We used Medicaid claims data between 2012 and 2019, from Delaware and Maryland (a comparison state), to identify births and postpartum contraceptive methods up to 60 days postpartum among patients aged 15-44 years who were covered in a full-benefit eligibility category. STUDY DESIGN: Using difference-in-differences, we assessed changes in LARC, tubal ligation, and short-acting methods (oral contraceptive, injectable, patch/ring). LARC rates were assessed at 60 days after delivery and on an immediate postpartum basis. Other methods were only assessed at 60 days. Analyses were conducted separately for an early-adopting high-capacity hospital (that delivers approximately half of all Medicaid financed births) and for all other later-adopting hospitals in the state. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Data were extracted from administrative claims. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The program increased postpartum LARC insertions by 60 days after delivery by 11.7 percentage points (95% CI: 10.7, 12.8) in the early-adopting hospital and 6.9 percentage points (95% CI: 4.8, 5.9) in later-adopting hospitals. Increases in IPP versus outpatient LARC drove the change, but we did not find evidence that IPP crowded-out outpatient LARC services. We observed decreases in short-acting methods, suggesting substitution between methods, but the share of patients with any method increased at the early-adopting hospital (5.2 percentage points; 95% CI: 3.5, 6.9) and was not statistically significantly different at the later-adopting hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Direct reimbursement for IPP LARC, in combination with provider training, had a meaningful impact on the share of Medicaid-enrolled postpartum women with LARC claims.

Changes in contraceptive method mix following the Colorado Family Planning Initiative.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the changes in contraceptive method use and mix among Colorado Title X clients following the 2009 Colorado Family Planning Initiative (CFPI), which allowed Colorado Title X providers to offer all contraceptive methods without medically unnecessary barriers. STUDY DESIGN: Using data on all visits to Colorado Title X clinics between 2007 and 2016 for women aged 10-49 years, we described trends in contraceptive method use by age group and race/ethnicity prior to and following the implementation of CFPI. RESULTS: The implementation of CFPI saw an abrupt increase in Title X visits. Visits subsequently declined steeply for non-Hispanic White clients while visits by Hispanic clients remained at elevated levels. During CFPI, the use of long-acting reversible contraceptives increased while the use of oral contraceptive pills decreased. Nonetheless, oral contraceptive pills remained the most common method used by Title X clients throughout the study period. Changes in the method mix varied by age and race/ethnicity. Method switching was relatively uncommon among established Title X clinic users. CONCLUSIONS: CFPI, which removed financial barriers to the most expensive methods, was associated with increases in the use of long-acting reversible contraceptives and changes in method mix that varied by age group and race/ethnicity. IMPLICATIONS: CFPI removed barriers to previously inaccessible methods that contributed to changes in the method mix at Title X clinics. That these changes were not uniform across ages and race/ethnicities emphasize that subgroup variation in family planning policy impact stems from heterogeneity in barriers to care and method-specific unmet demand.

Contraceptive uptake and compliance after structured contraceptive counseling - secondary outcomes of the LOWE trial.

INTRODUCTION: Highly effective long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) methods reduce unintended pregnancy rates; however, these methods are underutilized. The LOWE trial intervention provided structured contraceptive counseling resulting in increased uptake of LARC. This longitudinal follow up of the LOWE study assessed the long-term impact of the intervention by investigating the contraceptive use at 12 months with a focus on continued use of LARC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the cluster randomized LOWE trial, abortion, youth, and maternal health clinics were randomized to provide either structured contraceptive counseling (intervention) or standard contraceptive counseling (control). The intervention consisted of an educational video on contraceptive methods, key questions asked by the health care provider, a tiered effectiveness chart and a box of contraceptive models. Women ≥ age 18, who were sexually active or planned to be in the upcoming 6 months, could participate in the study. We assessed self-reported contraceptive use at three, six and 12 months. Contraceptive choice and switches were analyzed with descriptive statistics. Contraceptive use at 12 months and continued use of LARC were analyzed using mixed logistic regressions, with clinic included as a random effect. Analysis with imputed values were performed for missing data to test the robustness of results. RESULTS: Overall, at 12 months, women in the intervention group were more likely to be using a LARC method (aOR 1.90, 95% CI: 1.31-2.76) and less likely to be using a short-acting reversible contraceptive (SARC) method (aOR 0.66, 95% CI: 0.46-0.93) compared to the control group. Women counseled at abortion (aOR 2.97, 95% CI: 1.36-6.75) and youth clinics (aOR 1.81, 95% CI: 1.08-3.03) were more likely to be using a LARC method, while no significant difference was seen in maternal health clinics (aOR 1.84, 95% CI: 0.96-3.66). Among women initiating LARC, continuation rates at 12 months did not differ between study groups (63.9% vs. 63.7%). The most common reasons for contraceptive discontinuation were wish for pregnancy, followed by irregular bleeding, and mood changes. CONCLUSIONS: The LOWE trial intervention resulted in increased LARC use also at 12 months. Strategies on how to sustain LARC use needs to be further investigated.

Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Knowledge Among Female Adolescents Presenting to a Pediatric Emergency Department.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to assess awareness and use of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) among female adolescents presenting to a pediatric emergency department (PED). STUDY DESIGN: During routine presentation to an urban PED in New Jersey, female adolescents, aged 15-19 years, were asked to voluntarily complete an electronic survey about sexual practices and contraception. The PED is in an urban teaching hospital, treating 35,000 children annually. Patients could schedule a follow-up appointment at the hospital's obstetrics/gynecology clinic. Data were collected over 13 months, and follow-up was monitored to determine if they attended an outpatient appointment, and if so, what the outcome was. RESULTS: Data for 199 participants were analyzed. The median age of participants was 18 years, whereas 79% self-identified as Black, and 17.6% self-identified as Latina. Twenty-one percent of participants used a form of birth control during their first sexual encounter, the largest percentage being condoms (77.8%). Forty percent of participants reported some prior knowledge about contraceptive implants, and 20% had knowledge about intrauterine devices, whereas only 3 (1.5%) intrauterine devices and 2 (1%) arm implants had been previously used. Of the 78 participants that requested a follow-up, 14 (17.9%) completed their appointment. Of those, 2 (14%) were prescribed contraception (Depo-Provera shot and oral contraceptive pills). CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge about LARC remains low in our PED, despite it being the most effective method of contraception. Even when interventions were made to link interested respondents to outpatient women's health services, follow-up attendance was poor, and no patients obtained LARC. There is a significant discrepancy between the consensus standard of contraception care across all relevant medical specialties and current utilization by high-risk populations. Future efforts must focus on how to close this gap, and the ED could be pivotal for improving both reproductive health education and intervention among adolescent patients.

Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Initiation Among Adolescents After an American Academy of Pediatrics Policy Statement.

This cross-sectional study compares monthly rates of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) insertions among adolescents before and after an American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) policy statement recommending LARC for this age group.

Examining the impact of Medicaid payments for immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception on the mental health of low-income mothers.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of Medicaid immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception (IPP LARC) reforms on self-reported mental health among low-income mothers aged 18-44 years. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTING: We used national secondary data on self-reported mental health status in the past 30 days from the core component (2014-2019) of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). STUDY DESIGN: We estimated linear probability models for reporting any days of not good mental health in the past 30 days. We adjusted for individual-level factors, state-level factors, and state and year fixed effects. Our primary independent variable was an indicator for IPP LARC payment reform. We examined the effect of the Medicaid payment reforms on self-reported mental health status in the past 30 days using difference-in-differences and event-study designs. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Not applicable. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: State adoption of Medicaid IPP LARC reforms was associated with significant reductions (between 5.7% and 11.5%) in the predicted probability of reporting any days of not good mental health among low-income mothers. Treatment effects appeared to be driven by respondents reporting two or more children (less than 18 years of age) in the household (ATT = -0.028, p = 0.04). Results are robust to a series of sensitivity tests and alternative estimation strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that contemporary efforts to improve access to contraceptive methods may have important benefits beyond reproductive autonomy. These findings have implications for policymakers as the landscape related to family planning services continues to shift.

Block Scheduling for LARC in a Family Medicine Residency Program.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Only 20% of family physicians report providing long-acting reversible contraception (LARC). Clinician-related barriers include confidence and comfort with LARC counseling and insertion/removal, and limited availability and uptake. Training during residency may address barriers and increase access/availability of LARC to support reproductive autonomy. We sought to determine the impact of block scheduling LARC clinics on resident comfort and confidence with LARC counseling and insertion/removal. METHODS: LARC block schedules were established in a Midwest family medicine residency's primary clinic (FMC) and in a federally qualified health center rotation clinic. Baseline and end-of-study surveys, compared by Mann-Whitney U and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, were used to assess comfort and confidence with counseling and inserting LARC. The number of LARC devices placed at the FMC were collected for the intervention year and the year prior. RESULTS: Twenty of 30 residents completed the baseline survey; 13 completed the end-of-study survey. At the group and individual levels, comfort increased for counseling on Levonorgestrel (LNG) intrauterine devices (IUDs) and for inserting implants and LNG IUDs. Individual comfort increased for copper IUDs. Resident willingness to recommend LARC increased, and more devices were placed during the intervention year than the year prior in the FMC (all: P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: Block scheduling of LARC clinics was associated with increased residents' comfort and confidence with counseling and placement of implants (LNG IUDs) and with an increase in LARCs placed at one clinic. Changes to scheduling may be an effective educational strategy that may increase access/availability to LARC.

What do women need to know about long-acting reversible contraception? Perspectives of women from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds.

AIM: To identify components of an online education intervention to improve preference for, and uptake of, long-acting reversible contraception in women from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds (CALD). ISSUE ADDRESSED: Women from culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) backgrounds have greater rates of unintended pregnancies than those born locally and are less likely to use long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs), which are highly effective at reducing unintended pregnancy. Increasing the uptake of LARC in women from CALD backgrounds may reduce the burden of unintended pregnancy in this high-risk group. An online education intervention has been shown to be effective at increasing preference for and uptake of LARC in young women. We aimed to describe what women from CALD backgrounds thought were the potentially effective components of an online education intervention to increase preference for, and uptake of, long-acting reversible contraception. METHODS: This qualitative study involved semi-structured interviews with six Australian English-speaking women from each of Chinese, Indian, and Middle Eastern cultural backgrounds. Women were recruited through targeted Facebook advertising. Data were analysed using Braun and Clarke thematic analysis. RESULTS: A total of 18 participants were interviewed. We have demonstrated the importance of messages tailored to cultural values, translating the video, widening the target audience to both men and women and using specific social media platforms. For all women, the video needs to highlight the covertness of contraceptive methods, alongside stating cost and approach to access. For Indian women, the video needs to highlight the effect of LARC methods on the menstrual period for Indian women and include basic information on women's health. For Middle Eastern women the video should be explicit about LARC not equating to abortion and emphasise the low efficacy of natural contraceptive methods. For Chinese women, the video should address the misconception that hormones damage the body. Regarding delivery of the video, it should be translated and delivered by a female doctor from the same culture. For Chinese women, the video should include women from the same culture sharing anecdotes and use WeChat and Chinese schools as a platform for dissemination. For Middle Eastern and Indian women government websites should be used for dissemination. The video should be made available to all decision-makers in the reproductive planning process including male partners of Middle Eastern women, parents and peers of Chinese women, and for Indian women the male partner, family, and community leaders. CONCLUSIONS: There is a wide range of cultural adaptations that can be made to the online education videos about LARCs to improve uptake of LARCs and hence reduce the burden of unintended pregnancy in women from CALD grounds. SO WHAT?: Our findings will be used to modify an online education video about LARCs so that it is culturally appropriate for women from CALD backgrounds.

The Impact of Get It? on Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Use Among Adolescents and Young Adults.

OBJECTIVE: Long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) are the most effective contraceptive method to decrease pregnancy rates among adolescents and young adults (AYAs). Get It? (www.getitnobaby.com) is an innovative peer-based digital intervention that aims to increase LARC awareness and use among AYAs. The purpose of this study was to describe the impact of Get It? on LARC awareness and use among AYAs after exposure. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was conducted between 2 different Baylor College of Medicine Teen Health Clinics. Using a block randomization method, clinics were randomized to either the intervention or control group by week. Baseline and post-intervention surveys were conducted in addition to a 6-month post-intervention chart review to determine the primary outcome of LARC uptake and secondary outcomes including other LARC-specific behaviors and LARC attitudes. RESULTS: A total of 233 AYAs agreed to participate in the study, of which 134 were randomized to the control group and 99 to the intervention group. Initiation of LARC discussion with the provider was significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group. Additionally, LARC uptake within 6 months after study was almost significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group. Finally, intervention group respondents exhibited strong positive attitudes toward Get It? with regard to specific intervention components. CONCLUSION: This study supports Get It? as a tool to educate and motivate AYA girls to use the most effective form of birth control available to them. The digital format of this novel peer-based approach also contributes to the potential of this educational intervention by decreasing barriers to both dissemination and uptake. We recommend a larger multi-institutional study to confirm these results and determine the most efficient method of dissemination to reach at-risk AYAs before coitarche.

Views and experiences of long-acting reversible contraception among ethnic minorities in high-income countries: a systematic review of qualitative studies.

BackgroundEthnic minorities in high-income countries have higher rates of unintended pregnancies but are less likely to use highly efficacious long-acting reversible contraception (LARC). The reasons for this are unclear. AIM: To understand the views and experiences of ethnic minorities within high-income countries about LARC. METHODOLOGY: Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE and Sociological Abstracts were searched systematically to find qualitative articles about views on LARC. Titles and abstracts were screened to select qualitative studies about LARC whose participants were mainly from ethnic minorities in high-income countries. Quality assessment was conducted using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tool. Thematic synthesis was conducted. RESULTS: Seventeen studies (19 articles) met the inclusion criteria, 14 of which were from the USA (227 participants identified as Latina, 222 Black, 15 multiracial, 4 Asian). Two studies included 32 Chinese women in the UK and Australia and one included 20 Aboriginal women in Australia. Factors influencing uptake of LARC included side effects, convenience, and perceived efficacy of LARC compared with other methods; women's ideas, concerns and expectations; and external influences (partner, family/friends, health professionals and society). Convenience of LARC, control over reproductive decisions, and desire to prevent pregnancy were the main facilitators. Barriers included specific cultural concerns about irregular bleeding, concerns about racial discrimination, and family/friends having negative views on LARC. CONCLUSIONS: Ethnic minority women often have additional needs and concerns about LARC compared with the White majority. Further research is needed to develop and evaluate customised respectful counselling on contraception options for ethnic minority women and their partners.

Single-Visit Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Initiation Among Adolescents Before and During COVID-19.

PURPOSE: Single-visit long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) is cost-effective and convenient. Our objective was to compare incidence of single-visit LARC placement and associated factors during the year before the COVID-19 pandemic (March 15, 2020) and the first year of the pandemic. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed electronic health records from a large healthcare system. Eligible adolescents were aged 10-19 years and received outpatient LARC from March 15, 2019 to March 14, 2021. Logistic regression models determined the relationship of patient and provider characteristics on single-visit LARC before and during COVID-19. RESULTS: One thousand six adolescents initiated LARC during the study period. Fewer adolescents received single-visit LARC during COVID-19 (289/506, 57.1%) compared to before (315/500, 63.0%), although changes in odds of single-visit LARC were not statistically significant. Concordance between county of patient residence and the location of the LARC placement facility was associated with single-visit LARC before (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.75) and during (aOR = 1.74) the pandemic (both p < .05). During the pandemic, a few factors were associated with reduced odds of single-visit LARC: (1) public insurance (aOR = 0.49, p < .01), (2) nonobstetricians/nongynecologists providers (pediatrics [aOR = 0.35, p < .01], family medicine [aOR = 0.53, p < .01], or internal medicine [aOR = 0.14, p < .05]), and (3) advanced practice practitioners (aOR = 0.49, p < .01). DISCUSSION: Incidence of single-visit LARC was similar before and during the pandemic. Certain factors were associated with lower odds of single-visit LARC insertion, suggesting differential access during the pandemic for subgroups of adolescents. Our findings may guide policy and programmatic interventions to improve access to single-visit LARC for all adolescent populations.

Characteristics Associated With Physician Bias in Contraceptive Recommendations.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to examine associations between obstetrician-gynecologist (OBGYN) contraceptive recommendations and sociodemographic characteristics of patients and recommending physicians. METHODS: OBGYNs affiliated with residency programs across the United States were recruited via email to participate in an online exploratory survey depicting scenarios of reproductive-age women of differing race and socioeconomic status, all other factors identical, and were asked to provide contraceptive recommendations. The χ2 test, Fisher's exact tests, and logistic regression were used to analyze recommendation differences based on physician and patient characteristics. RESULTS: Of 172 physician respondents, large proportions self-identified as white (74%) and attending physicians (56%) from the Mid-Atlantic (42%). In multivariate logistic regression, self-administered methods (odds ratio [OR], 0.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.2-0.8) and condoms (OR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.3-0.9) were recommended significantly less to Black high SES patients compared with white high SES patients. Non-white physicians recommended tubal ligation (OR, 0.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5-0.9) significantly less than white physicians, and recommended long-acting reversible contraception (OR, 3.3, CI 2.2-5.2) and condoms (OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1-1.9) significantly more. Trainee physicians recommended self-administered methods (OR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.2-0.4), condoms (OR, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.2-0.3), and tubal ligation (OR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.3-0.6) significantly less than attending physicians. CONCLUSIONS: OBGYN contraceptive recommendations differed based on patients' perceived race and SES. Recommendations also differed based on race, training level, and geographic location of the recommending physician. Results suggest that physician bias contributes to contraceptive recommendations. OBGYNs should receive education about contraceptive coercion and patient-centered decision-making so that they provide high-quality counseling to all patients.

Cost Savings and Effectiveness of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception (LARC) on the Prevention of Pregnancy in Adolescents: A Systematic Review.

Adolescent pregnancy is a major public health issue with profound implications for health and socioeconomic factors. The use of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) could be an interesting strategy to reduce the unintended pregnancy rate. However, the cost of LARC is still a barrier to widespread adoption. This study aimed to analyze the effectiveness and economic impact of LARC compared with non-LARC methods in preventing unintended pregnancy among adolescent girls. This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023387735) and conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. We included articles covering adolescents aged 10-19 years without language restrictions that evaluated the use of LARC compared with non-LARC in terms of effectiveness and the public health costs of unintended pregnancy. The search for articles included the databases MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Lilacs, using the entry terms "Adolescent" and "Long-Acting Reversible Contraception." We evaluated the risk of bias and the certainty of the evidence for each outcome of interest. The search retrieved a total of 1,169 articles and, after the title and abstract, we identified 40 articles for full-text analysis. Out of the 40 studies evaluated, 4 articles met the eligibility criteria for cost evaluation, and 1 met the eligibility criteria for effectiveness as an outcome. In conclusion, LARC emerges as the most effective and cost-effective contraceptive method. The cost of utilizing LARC, especially the copper IUD, is significantly lower than the costs attributable to unintended pregnancies in adolescence.

Increasing Access to Contraception: Examining Barriers and Facilitators of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception.

Objective(s): To identify barriers and facilitators related to reimbursement processes, device acquisition costs, stocking, and supply of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) from 27 jurisdictions (26 states/1 territory) participating in the Increasing Access to Contraception Learning Community from 2016 to 2018. Materials and Methods: A descriptive study using qualitative data collected through 27 semistructured key informant interviews was conducted during the final year of the learning community among all jurisdictional teams. Excerpts were extracted and coded by theme, then summarized as barriers or facilitators using implementation science methods. Results: Most jurisdictions (89%) identified barriers to reimbursement processes, device acquisition, stocking, and supply of LARC devices, and 85% of jurisdictions identified facilitators for these domains. Payment methodology challenges and lack of billing and coding processes were identified as the most common barriers to reimbursement processes. Device acquisition cost challenges and lack of delivery facility protocols for billing were the most common barriers to device acquisition, stocking, and supply of LARC. The most common facilitator of reimbursement processes was expanded payment methodology options, whereas supplemental funding for acquisition costs and protocol development were identified as the most common facilitators of device acquisition, stocking, and supply. Conclusion: Revised payment methodologies and broader health systems changes including additional funding sources and protocols for billing, stocking, and supply were used by learning community jurisdictions to address identified barriers. The learning community framework offers a forum for information exchange, peer-to-peer learning, and sharing of best practices to support jurisdictions in addressing identified barriers and facilitators affecting contraception access.

Adolescent and young adult long-acting reversible contraception post-insertion visit attendance before and after COVID-19.

OBJECTIVES: Widespread use of telemedicine for contraceptive care, including long-acting reversible contraception (LARC), was adopted in the United States in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Given the rapid implementation of these services, little is known about the use of telemedicine for adolescent and young adult (AYA) contraceptive care. This study examined the routine use of telemedicine for LARC post-insertion care by comparing visit attendance between AYAs receiving LARC before and after the COVID-19 pandemic onset. METHODS: This analysis included LARC insertions 3/1/19-11/30/19 (pre-pandemic onset cohort) and 4/1/20-12/31/20 (post-pandemic onset cohort) from three Adolescent Medicine subspecialty clinics in the United States. De-identified data were collected via review of the electronic health record. Descriptive statistics, χ2 tests, and t-tests described and compared groups. Adjusted logistic regression models examined factors associated with attending a post-insertion visit and attending this visit via telemedicine. RESULTS: This analysis included 525 LARC insertions (279 pre- and 246 post-pandemic onset). The proportion of AYAs attending a post-insertion visit increased after the COVID-19 pandemic onset (pre 30 % vs. post 46 %; p≤0.001). Adjusted models revealed that the post-pandemic onset cohort was nearly twice as likely to attend a post-insertion visit as the pre-pandemic onset cohort (OR=1.90; 95 % CI=1.68-2.15). Of those attending this visit in the post-pandemic onset cohort (n=112), 42 % utilized telemedicine. CONCLUSIONS: AYAs were more likely to attend post-insertion visits after the COVID-19 pandemic onset than before. Telemedicine may have influenced this change in visit attendance.

Patient Barriers to Discontinuing Long-Acting Reversible Contraception.

OBJECTIVES: To describe how frequently a national sample of patients with experience discontinuing or desiring discontinuation of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) experienced barriers to discontinuation. METHODS: We conducted an online survey of individuals ages 18 to 50 in the United States who had previously used and discontinued or attempted to discontinue LARC. We recruited respondents using the Amazon platform MTurk. Respondents provided demographic information and answered questions regarding their experience discontinuing LARC, including reasons removal was deferred or denied. We analyzed frequency of types of barriers encountered and compared these by demographic factors. RESULTS: Of the 376 surveys analyzed, 99 (26%) described experiencing at least one barrier to removal. Barriers were disproportionately reported by those who had public health insurance, a history of abortion, and a history of birth compared to those who did not report barriers to removal. They also more frequently identified as Latinx, Asian, or Middle Eastern. Most barriers were provider-driven and potentially modifiable. CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE: Barriers to LARC discontinuation are common and may be provider- or systems-driven. Providers should be mindful of biases in their counseling and practices to avoid contributing to these barriers.

Perceptions of access to long-acting reversible contraception removal among women in Burkina Faso.

OBJECTIVES: Long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) initiation has been well-studied and intervened upon. Because LARC requires provider intervention for initiation and removal, it is critical to measure informed choice at the time of desired discontinuation as well. We examined perceptions of access to LARC discontinuation among women at two sites in Burkina Faso, where LARC is the dominant method in the contraceptive mix. STUDY DESIGN: We analyzed data from a 2017-2018 population-based, cross-sectional survey of 281 implant users and 55 intrauterine device users at two sites in Burkina Faso. We measured perceptions of access to LARC discontinuation through survey items assessing whether participants (1) were informed on how to discontinue the method, (2) believed they could have LARC removed without a lot of difficulty, (3) believed cost would be a barrier to discontinuation, (4) had ever attempted to have a provider remove LARC, and (5) successfully had LARC removed. The distribution of these measures was examined in the population and for differences by gravida, parity, domestic partnership, fertility desires, and recency of last childbirth. RESULTS: Thirty-eight (11%) of current LARC users reported that they were not informed on how to discontinue, 56 (17%) believed having their device removed would be difficult, and 54 (16%) believed cost would be a barrier to removal. Of women who attempted removal, providers did not immediately remove LARC on request for 10 (28%). CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate that LARC uptake is an insufficient measure of reproductive access or choice. Future studies should include patient-centered measures that span the full duration of contraceptive use. IMPLICATIONS: This paper finds that a sizable proportion of LARC users lack information about method discontinuation and perceive or experience barriers to method removal. These findings call for a reconsideration of free and informed contraceptive choice to include the entire duration of contraceptive use, not only the time of method provision.

Service trends among non-obstetrics/gynecology providers in the U.S.: Long-acting reversible contraception insertions, removals, and re-insertions.

This study evaluates trends in long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) services among obstetrician/gynecologists (OB/GYNs) and non-OB/GYNs in the U.S. during 2012-2018. Using public and private insurance claims from the Symphony Health database, we calculated the percentage of LARC insertions, removals, and reinsertions performed by OB/GYNs and non-OB/GYNs. We then assessed time trends with linear regression. The proportion of LARC services that were performed by non-OBGYNs increased modestly between 2012 and 2018. Increases were similar for insertions, removals, and reinsertions. Further research is needed to understand trends in LARC service provision within primary care to better tailor medical training and policy interventions.

Contraceptive Method Switching and Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Removal in U.S. Safety Net Clinics, 2016-2021.

OBJECTIVE: To describe patterns of contraceptive method switching and long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) removal in a large network of community health centers. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using individual-level electronic health record data from 489 clinics in 20 states from 2016 to 2021. We used logistic regression models, including individual-, clinic-, and state-level covariates, to calculate adjusted odds ratios and predicted probabilities of any observed contraceptive method switching and LARC removal among those with baseline incident LARC, both over 4-year time periods. RESULTS: Among 151,786 patients with 513,753 contraceptive encounters, 22.1% switched to another method at least once over the 4-year observation period, and switching patterns were varied. In patients with baseline LARC, the adjusted predicted probability of switching was 19.0% (95% CI 18.0-20.0%) compared with patients with baseline moderately effective methods (16.2%, 95% CI 15.1-17.3%). The adjusted predicted probability of switching was highest among the youngest group (28.6%, 95% CI 25.8-31.6% in patients aged 12-14 years) and decreased in a dose-response relationship by age to 8.4% (95% CI 7.4-9.4%) among patients aged 45-49 years. Latina and Black race and ethnicity, public or no insurance, and baseline Title X clinic status were all associated with higher odds of switching at least once. Among baseline LARC users, 19.4% had a removal (to switch or discontinue) within 1 year and 30.1% within 4 years; 97.6% of clinics that provided LARC also had evidence of a removal. CONCLUSION: Community health centers provide access to method switching and LARC removal. Contraceptive switching and LARC removal are common, and clinicians should normalize switching and LARC removal among patients.